Suited-connectors

[ashmc2]

Today’s topic that only one or two people will answer. Suited-connectors.

If, how, and when do you think it is most lucrative to play suited-cons?

Pretty soon when I get on stars and maybe play with you guys a little bit, you’ll all know my whole game. lol

These are my current theories on SC’s. But I’m an open-minded player always willing to give a new system a shot as long as there’s a solid sounding theorem behind it.

I consider SC’s to be mostly worth playing only in multi-way pots.

I only play mid and high SC’s. I won’t often play anything under 7-6, unless maybe from blinds.

Personally, I only play from mid to late position and only if there are or I think there will be 4 or more to see the flop, (me included.) I will not pay much to get in with these hands, (usually only the minimum bet.) And if I don’t hit hard I’m done. I don’t believe fighting with a junk ass kicker. I’ve learned the hard way; losing too many hands by hitting mid to top pr on the flop only to end up being out-drawn by overs that hung around till later streets or either losing the battle to Axs, where x is the same as my paired up SC that also hit.

I don’t play too many 1-gappers either or often. I’m too tight for many of the weaker starting hands. I think this is due to a lack of self-assurance in my post flop play. I play more with the odds than trying to make plays against opponents or by reads on people.

My SC’s don’t hit hard too often but when they do I usually make enough to justify the money I waste when I don’t hit. Your hand is usually camouflaged so well that they pay you through the nose all the way to the end when you do hit.

What are your thoughts on how and why I play my SC’s?
Do you agree? Disagree?
Do you play yours similar?