|
|
|
|
#1
10-17-06, 02:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the response. I found the PT Agg thing and kicked it off (since my Observer HH db is quite large and I want those numbers and the ones from my main db). Hopefully it will be done by morning.
The table totals aren't very promising using the default scoring, since at 3/6 NL, every single table has a negative score. Of course, there is obviously a difference between a -3.6 and a -9.6. I think glancing through the tables and finding the fish with the largest scores is the way to go. That's basically what I do anyway, but it will be much easier in this interface than going through the tables by hand or by using PAHud's "stats" (I use that term loosely). Will it be worth the monthly fee? I'm not sure yet. Maybe. Hopefully Boobie and Mayhem will chime in as well, and maybe someone will post some solid custom scoring for 6 max NL. 
|
|
#3
10-17-06, 03:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are those rules in ADDITION to the standard rules that are already in there, or is this ALL that you use to score your fish? I have to think this isn't nearly enough info to create decent scoring. I mean, yeah, it will point out the ultra loose players, but I can do that much myself (for free) with PAHud. I'd think optimal rules would incorporate lots of other rules too - looking for the ultra passive players, looking for the guys who call everything down and LOSE at showdown most of the time, and so on and so forth...
|
|
#4
10-18-06, 01:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any more responses to this?
I've decided that the defaul rules are junk. Well, maybe not junk, but certainly not very good. Surely one of you SS users has found a decent set of rules to use, no? I could try to come up with my own, but why reinvent the wheel? |
|
#6
10-18-06, 02:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pfft. Really? I thought Boobie was singing it's praises not long ago too.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
