|
|
|
|
#1
10-11-06, 05:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I for one appreciate implied odds more than most... however in this case they arent here.
I did clearly define my hand by reraising, but Im not going to just call in that spot! As far as him he has horrible implied odds. He has a suited 3 gapper and called 25% of his stack. Assuming he doubles each time he hits (not unreasonable) that means hed win roughly $100 1 in every 8 times and lose $25 (assuming he called the original raise for some reason) 7 times for a net EV of -$75. Eh what am I saying... he called a raise from the SB with 73s.... then he called a reraise HU with it!!! lol
__________________
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." |
|
#2
10-11-06, 06:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Again, this guy was a horrible player, as easily witnessed by the fact that he was sitting with less then the full buy in.
But with slightly better cards and a full buy (or preferably DS) in I don't completely disagree with a call. In this situation, it was a horrid beat(well, the majority of the money went in while he was a favorite, but that aside) and horrid play by his part to call the inital raise or the reraise. I was just playing the ol devil's advocate since I haven't had too much of a chance to post lately. By the way, isn't he looking at winning $147 when he calls the 25? His entire stack plus what was already in the pot? |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
