|
|
|
|
#2
07-04-06, 02:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
You are getting too worked up about the won at showdown % if you only have 1200 hands. Many of those pokertracker stats aren't even negligible until about 20,000 hands.
|
|
#3
07-04-06, 02:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, I don't really think won at showdown % is that that great of a stat. Everyone I have over 5K hands has one around 47-54. If it is below that, you are probably just running bad.
|
|
#4
07-04-06, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because a lot of the time a +EV call on the river in NL could have a W$SD around 25-33% (in the most simple situation of just calling a bet on the river), or do you have some other reason why you don't like this stat?
|
|
#5
07-04-06, 01:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Personally, I think went to showdown % is a better statistic than won at showndown %. I suppose there is some merit in both stats, but they don't really materialize until you have far more hands than you currently do now.
|
|
#6
07-05-06, 03:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right...
Take a limit poker hand, for example: If you're getting 10:1 on a river call and you are winning 30% of these showdowns, that is HUGE +EV. Sure, you could start folding a lot more to increase your W$SD number, but that woud be killing much more important numbers, namely your BB/100. The same is true for NL, as you suggested. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
