While you have stars open...

[Boobie Lover]

Congratulations, you just won the award for fastest contradiction.

[Aequitas58]

In that case, Mayhem won the award too.

[bdawg31]

and even though i went 0-2 - they seem pretty soft. I have been running pretty bad lately - i think i might pound on these for a while.

[MAYHEM45]

I meant less profitable than playing my regular games, and therefore not worth playing.

[johnp158]

So far these seem super-weak. I decided to play one. Just donked off a ton of chips, though, to a guy playing JJ really passively.

[MAYHEM45]

This just in...$4.40 20 tables. Yuck.

[holdemstewart]

Doesnt sound like such a bad idea, whats wrong with it?

-John

[Talking Poker]

These (the 90 x $50s) sound awesome... I don't follow some of the logic in this thread about how soft they are meaning they should be avoided, so I think I will give them a whirl. Probably tomorrow, as it's kinda late now to get started in one. At $50 a pop, this could be a nice way of stepping back a bit and (hopefully) rebuilding. Figure if I multi-table 3 of these at a time and FT 20% of them... that should be profitable, right?

Let's see - what's the payout structure?
$1350
$900
$540
$450
$360
$292.50
$247.50
$202.50
$157.50

That's not bad, but it is a bit less than I was hoping it would be. Maybe I will hammer 10 of these as a little experiment tomorrow...

[Nikita]

Hmmm... I'm actually kinda interested in these. I'm still sticking to the low limits and working at these will probably help my bankroll better than continuing to grind out the $1-$5 MTTs. And if the $22s and $55s are soft, I can only expect these to be worse.

[Talking Poker]

Good logic. I think these would be great for low bankrollers.... I suspect the reason some people don't want to see them is because they will be taking some of the fish away from the $22 ones.