Good stats for a session in 1$/2$ LIMIT

[Windbreaker]

Without looking at the numbers at all, the numbers for a particular session don't necessary indicate how well/poorly you played.

You can have the most awful numbers out there....but if you made the right decision, you still play well.

I usually disregard the numbers and worry about the play. If I make a poor decision, then I think I play poorly...regardless if I won a huge pot as a result. Numbers will change as with the table, opponents, and situations that are faced....don't worry about them as much as the decision you make.

[Talking Poker]

Seeing nearly half the flops after 182 limit hands is too loose. I don't care how great a run of cards you had, that's too loose, which is the same as making "poor decisions" in my book.

His showdowns won number (THAT is a result) is meaningless, of course, but you can still tell that he's seeing way too many flops.

[kkirk1329]

thanks for the info

as for the seeing 45% of the flops, not a whole lot of raising was going on at all, but i still agree this is probably to high of a number, and this was probably my best session ever (profit wise) i bought in with 30$ and walked out with 135$ which means i did make some right moves.

[Talking Poker]

Actually, that's where you are wrong... that means no such thing. Results (money won/lost) from a 200 (or 2000, for that matter) hand session are completely insignificant. If anything, I'd say it shows that you were playing like a maniac and happened to have a good night (normal variance). Playing like that WILL just as easily break you in the long run.