The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > Off Topic > Sports
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-04, 07:38 PM
Chutups Chutups is offline
Donkey
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 90
Chutups has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

I don't know why Kobe is compared to Jordan, he had Shaq who is the most dominant player to ever play the game. While Jordan led a bulls dynasty that is the only dominant team in NBA history that didn't have a dominant inside prescence. Watching LA this year it's prety clear that was Shaqs team.
  #2  
Old 11-24-04, 11:54 AM
jimmytheg's Avatar
jimmytheg jimmytheg is offline
Maniac
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 273
jimmytheg has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

It's a stretch to say the Shaq was the most dominating player ever....you could easily make the case that Chamberlin was more dominating....Jordan too....

In fact, if jordan's bulls were the only dynasty without a dominating big man, that might be all the evidence you need to say he was the most dominant player to ever play the game....shaq didnt win when jordan was in the league, and when he was out, olajuwon in his prime schooled him....shaq never won a title until Kobe came into his own, and over those title runs, Kobe took most of the big shots in the big games near the end.
__________________
https://secure.pokerchamps.com/pokerpublic/arequest?acode=JIMMYTHEG
  #3  
Old 11-24-04, 12:25 PM
eddo31 eddo31 is offline
Shark
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: central MA / Cincinnati
Posts: 751
eddo31 has between 10 and 49 Rep Points
Default

with the same type of argument, you can clearly downgrade jordan because he didnt come close to winning a title until pippen became a star. shaq at least made it to the finals without kobe (he did have penny), but jordan never got out of the east without pippen at his side.

chamberlin was spectacular, but he NEVER beat russell, so it is difficult to say that he was the most dominating in his own time, nevermind ever. i am not sure who was, but it seems like shaq cant be dismissed from the argument.

Last edited by eddo31; 11-24-04 at 12:29 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com