|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of the User Rep System? | |||
| I like it. Leave it turned on. |
   
|
24 | 92.31% |
| I hate it. Turn it off. |
  
|
2 | 7.69% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
01-25-06, 06:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well when you create two accounts and you start flaming your other account with your new account, people are going to dislike you and negative rep should be expected.
__________________
-Hawt Sincerity is everything. And once you learn how to fake that, you've got it made. |
|
#3
01-25-06, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i understand that much but i dont think that it if you dislike someone you should give them negative rep. If its for the quality of a post or lack there of so be it.
__________________
I'm Ron Burgundy saying, go F--- yourself San Diego |
|
#4
01-25-06, 08:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I disagree with this. I can't speak for everyone, of course, but I know the Rep I give out has nothing to do with liking or disliking someone.
But even if that was the case, back up a bit. What made that person be liked or disliked anyway? I doubt anyone here is disliked for the superior poker knowledge they have and all the great poker strategy posts they contribute to the site. I also doubt that anyone is liked for their bullshit posts, scams, and that sort of thing. Think about it.... If you got negative rep for creating a new account and fake arguing with yourself, for example, I'm guessing it WAS because of the quality of those posts. That sort of thing is a waste of everyone time, and adds nothing to the board. Not only that, but people will undoubtedly feel like you are trying to "trick" them, which is also a good reason to give negative Rep, IMO... |
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
