|
|
|
|
#1
01-24-06, 12:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, I think it would not be a good idea. .
This is certainly open to discussion though. If people want to "sign" their rep in the comments field, so be it. But if it's not anonymous, I think it could lead to unnecessary problems, flame wars, etc. What do you see as the added benefits, Chip? |
|
#3
01-24-06, 01:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I got one in that thread too... from you, as it turns out. Interesting. Good thing I'm a big enough man to not have to flame back, cause I could put a serious hurting on your rep if I wanted to
 Anyway, as I just posted in that thread, "Use your own criteria/logic when giving out + and - Rep... not someone else's." |
|
#5
01-24-06, 01:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, I saw that. Hence my reply to that post in the other thread and then this post here...
Or maybe I'm missing your point... 
|
|
#6
01-24-06, 02:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nah... I missed the point...
I didn't see the post in the other thread.... This is getting complicated... Going to start drawing out a flow chart to help follow along. Anyways... Tried to give you a "positive" in this thread... Above the post I said "Good Point" in. But it wouldn't let me... said something about spreading it around first. Maybe I'll be "Good" Chip tonight... and post something contributive.
__________________
3rd Grade Reading Level! |
|
#7
01-24-06, 02:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good Chip? Who is he? Haven't seen him around these parts in AGES!
 You have to hit up like 10 people before you can give the same person rep again. Maybe I should lower that to 5. No worries man... it will all work out in the end. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
