|
|
|
|
#1
12-05-05, 12:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
It's usually listed VP$IP, PFR, and the 3rd # is postflop aggression factor, 2 being the "average correct" value for this.
If you see a 4th value, it's usually referring to the # of hands in the sample size. Shabi is 24/18/2.4/150 for example is 24% VPIP 18% PFR 2.4 Agg factor thru 150 hands.
__________________
Get well soon, MCA! |
|
#2
12-05-05, 12:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Post flop aggression - but of course!
No idea why I brain farted on this one. |
|
#3
12-05-05, 12:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
so ur saying a "2" on the 3rd number means his uses the correct amount of aggressiveness?
wuts the range on that 3rd # ?
__________________
"Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret" "Rome wasn't built in a day" |
|
#4
12-05-05, 02:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Whats the range on the first number? 24% seems kinda high to me.
__________________
I need 'em for my footsies. |
|
#5
12-05-05, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"2" is accepted as a basic correct value of total postflop aggression. People who use stats regularly go further and break it down by street. So a flop aggression of 2.8, a turn aggression of 2.1, a river aggression of 1.8. Those are avg. to get a total postflop reading. If I have my Poker Ace running and I have the stats readily available, it just serves as a quick read. However, if I'm in a hand and someone has an agg factor of 2.5, that doesn't mean much different to me than a 2.0 or 3.0. It's just when you see values way below or way above 2, well, you get the idea. As far as 24% being high for VPIP, remember, I'm talking about 6-max limit games. You steal more, defend more, and generally have to play more hands. In full ring games (when I played them), I was significantly lower.
__________________
Get well soon, MCA! |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
