![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you are playing low limit sitngos on Party, the $10 + $1 are the best to do. Why pay a tourney fee of 20% at the $5 + $1 level when you can pay only 10% instead. Plus, if you are good enough to play the $5 ones, surely you are good enough to play the $10 ones anyways.
__________________
That's how I rolled. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree....there is really no difference between the 5 and 10 sit and go's level-of-play wise, but the rake is ten percent higher at the 5's. I never understood why party did that, every other site only charges 50 cents rake for the 5's, but i guess they do it because they can. Doesnt seem to be hurting their revenues.
__________________
https://secure.pokerchamps.com/pokerpublic/arequest?acode=JIMMYTHEG |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I found out the same thing, the 5$ and 10$ sit and go's were pretty much similar play wise. I tried a 30$ sit and go and it seemed to be much tighter and the game went slower.
|
![]() |
|
|