![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm 3-2 through my first five $100 matches. One of those losses should have definitely been a win (how many times do I need to get him all in with the best hand???), but I'm sure it evens out somewhere... like this gift, for example...
This was my fastest match to date - one hand. I really thought I'd only get paid off if I hit the 8. Wasn't expecting him to shove all his chips in with 4 cards to a straight on the board, but to each their own. I think because I led at the river, he assumed I didn't have it. You'd be AMAZED at how many people make that incorrect assumption. ![]() PokerStars Game #2850519076: Tournament #14040839, Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/20 - 17:24:47 (ET) Table '14040839 1' One on One Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: Papa Chippi (1500 in chips) Seat 2: Rogue23 (1500 in chips) Papa Chippi: posts small blind 10 Rogue23: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Rogue23 [9d 7s] Papa Chippi: raises 40 to 60 Rogue23: calls 40 *** FLOP *** [5h 6s 4d] Rogue23: bets 85 Papa Chippi: raises 85 to 170 Rogue23: calls 85 *** TURN *** [5h 6s 4d] [Qd] Rogue23: checks Papa Chippi: bets 300 Rogue23: calls 300 *** RIVER *** [5h 6s 4d Qd] [3s] Rogue23: bets 545 Papa Chippi: raises 425 to 970 and is all-in Rogue23: calls 425 and is all-in *** SHOW DOWN *** Papa Chippi: shows [5c Qc] (two pair, Queens and Fives) Rogue23: shows [9d 7s] (a straight, Three to Seven) Papa Chippi is sitting out Rogue23 collected 3000 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 3000 | Rake 0 Board [5h 6s 4d Qd 3s] Seat 1: Papa Chippi (button) (small blind) showed [5c Qc] and lost with two pair, Queens and Fives Seat 2: Rogue23 (big blind) showed [9d 7s] and won (3000) with a straight, Three to Seven |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok... 10 $100 HU matches in the books. I went 5-5. I'm not too upset with that though, because more of the losses could have gone my way than the wins could have gone the other way. Know what I mean?
Here was my favorite. This was the second hand (I folded my SB in the first hand). Are you kidding me??? LOL... PokerStars Game #2851756502: Tournament #14047254, Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2005/10/20 - 19:59:12 (ET) Table '14047254 1' One on One Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Rogue23 (1490 in chips) Seat 2: sylwia (1510 in chips) sylwia: posts small blind 10 Rogue23: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Rogue23 [2c 5c] sylwia: calls 10 Rogue23: checks *** FLOP *** [5d 4c 5h] Rogue23: checks sylwia: checks *** TURN *** [5d 4c 5h] [Kc] Rogue23: bets 35 sylwia: calls 35 *** RIVER *** [5d 4c 5h Kc] [2h] Rogue23: bets 85 sylwia: raises 95 to 180 Rogue23: raises 215 to 395 sylwia: raises 215 to 610 Rogue23: raises 825 to 1435 and is all-in sylwia: calls 825 *** SHOW DOWN *** Rogue23: shows [2c 5c] (a full house, Fives full of Deuces) sylwia: shows [5s 4d] (a full house, Fives full of Fours) sylwia collected 2980 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 2980 | Rake 0 Board [5d 4c 5h Kc 2h] Seat 1: Rogue23 (big blind) showed [2c 5c] and lost with a full house, Fives full of Deuces Seat 2: sylwia (button) (small blind) showed [5s 4d] and won (2980) with a full house, Fives full of Fours |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
omfg BRTUAL
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The funny thing is I was behind the whole way! LOL...
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, I now have 20 $100 matches in the books. These are not going NEARLY as well as the $50 ones did. Fortunately, I just won my last two, bringing my $100 HU record to 9-11. No kidding. Yuck!
The good news is, I have had some SICK luck during these, well below what I would expect it to be in the long run. I would guess that I was in total control of 3 or 4 of those losses, even getting my opponents all in once or twice, only to have them double up a couple of times and watch everything fall apart. It's hard to think in terms of long term numbers, but I'm fairly confident I can win 60% at this level.... Of course, if I can win 70% at the $50 level...........? I'll play 5 more, so I'll have 25 of each to look at, and then probably do 25 more of each to have a better sample size. If nothing else, this has been interesting, fun, and good practice. Current numbers (the $100 ones really killed my ROI): 27-18 (18-7 for $50, 9-11 for $100) 8% ROI |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
8%... rough.. dont worry you'll hit a hot streak one of these times.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, I went 4-1 in my last 5. I need a break from these (addictive things), but here are my numbers through 50 matches:
$50 - 18-7, $587.50 $100 - 13-12, -$25 (damn juice!) Totals: 31-19, $562.50, 14% ROI. I'm not sure if I should move back down to $50, stick with $100, or what... I think I'll play 25 more of each and reevaluate. 100 of these should be a pretty decent sample size, I would think. |
![]() |
|
|