|
|
|
|
#1
09-20-05, 01:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Nice numbers! I'm pretty sure "5" is a significant sample size too. LOL...
I don't really play SNGs much any more, so I can't really answer your other questions. I was all set to do a 100 SNG experiment of my own (for starters) to see how my numbers would shake out, but I went back to my favorite game (6 max limit) recently and have been KILLING it, so I can't justify playing anything else right now. Wait until you guys see the numbers I've put up clearing this latest Party bonus... |
|
#2
09-20-05, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm doing the same thing..
in fact I asked alot of the same questions here
and I posted some of my stats here If your comfortable 4-tabling cash games I haven't experienced to much difficulty in 4-tabling sngs. I finished ootm 12 sngs in a row which can really shake your confidence. I think one of the most important things that you can do is keep detailed records, I'm using this spreadsheet ( its New 500..) in conjunction with PT to figure out how I'm doing. I don't really even think that 200 sngs (much less 5) has much statistical validity in figuring out ROI or ITM although it should give you an idea. There are a ton of excellent sources for sngs online but very few available in print, if your serious about doing this I highly recommend spending some time doing research. GL bro these things can be very swinging don't let it shake you. |
|
#3
09-20-05, 08:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In all seriousness, I would guess 1000 SNGs would be a reasonable number to start drawing some conclusions. But DAMN, that is a LOT of poker time.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
