NL strategy

[Zybomb]

This strategy was given by a man who now goes by the pen name of Roy Rounder, he finished in 30th place in Event 2 this year at the series

He has newsletter which he sends out from time to time to his mailing list (which somehow I got on although i dont know how... but im not complaining some of the things discussed are interesting)

He recommended that this strategy be used in low limit NL TOURNAMENTS (30+3 and lower) not cash games. And it was to be used until there were 4-5 players left.

It was based on the theory that in low limits players will call with too many hands, and your chances of doubling up is large enough. If I recall correct it was...

AA or KK: Go all in

AKs AKo 22-QQ limp or call a standard raise. If you flop a set move in. TPTK bet aggressively

Axs and suited connectors 78 and above: Limp only, if you hit your flush or straight move in. If you flo a draw call bets when pot odds are in your favor, otherwise fold.

Everything Else: Fold

Realistically this makes no sense -- any idiot who has seen u fold 200 hands and then suddenly move in isnt going to call you unless he is strong (granted sometimes not strong enough)

However maybe it operates under the assumption that folding often can most of the time get you close to the money in low limit SnGs bc of the loose aggressive and stupid play that often is around these games. In addition youd only need 1 double up or so to be in good shape. He advises once it gets down to 4-5 players this strategy has to be aborted.

Never tried it but hey maybe ill enter a 5 dollar SnG once im up and running again and see what happens -- i mean he wouldnt jus pull this out of his ass and print it would he? lol

[Talking Poker]

I think it's interesting. As you are seeing, it looks like playing normally is more profitable, but I do think it's interesting.

As for your 2 BB/100 win rate, if you are able to play 12 tables at a time and log 60 hands per hour per table, that comes out to 2 * 12 * 60 / 100 = 14.4 BB per hour, which is nothing to sneeze at. With a $2 BB (not sure what table buy in that corresponds to), you're approaching $30 per hour playing mindless poker, yes?

Are you really able to earn 14 BB/100 at $25 NL normally? That's astounding....

[greenbuckets]

I have heard this before, but it is way too restrictive.

Easy money is there for the taking at low buy in NL games. Get on a site, look for a table where there are several players playing below the buy in. On party, it is not hard to find a table with 6-7 seats with players who buy in with $20-$40 when the maximum buy-in is $100.

Get a good hand and put them all in. They will call with Ax, QJ, 78, etc. Just last night, I went all in with JJ and was called with someone holding K5o. He had $34 and then bought in again for $20. A few hands later I put him all in with my 66 and he called again with K5, though suited this time. He typed in "K5 is my lucky hand." Not anymore, I guess.

It may not seem like much, but taking $20 at a time adds up real quick.

[nflchad]

Bold above

[Reel Deal]

Sklansky has a similar system in his Advanced Tournament book... he developed it for a casino owner who gave his daughter the present of a seat in the WSOP main event, even though she never played before. Apparently it worked pretty well for her (can't remeber if she made it into the $ or not... have to go back and look).

[badblood44]

This begs the question of why you are playing poker at all. Is it to win money? Or is it to become a better player?

How you answer depends on your own goals. I maintain that if you strive for the 2nd, the 1st will come by default. But that's just me.

Personally, I'm not in a position where playing a set NL-ring game strategy is personally fulfilling, even though it may generate profits. There isn't any intellectual challenge, which for me is the basis for my desire to play poker.

Please don't misunderstand me and think I'm being critical of anyone who does subscribe to the other goal. I'm just stating what my own motivations are.

[nflchad]

I agree entirely, the only reason I played this way for the 2K hands was I wanted to see how effective it actually was.

[johnp158]

If I'm thinking of the same strategy (and I'm positive that I am), it also advocates folding AKo preflop, not just facing a raise, but period. As far as I know, the strategy doesn't really address TPTK, but I think the strategy's originator would advocate a check-fold (btw, this is not some pro who came up with this. It's a well-known poster on another poker forum, and who is only well known because he posts so much and seems to be a successful player). He insists that whileit is not THE best strategy for LLNL, but that it's better than 99% of the strategies that LLNL players use.

I tried this strategy while clearing a bonus, since it does allow you to play more tables at a time, very mechanically. The first two times I got KK I moved in and was called with AQo and AKo. When you play like this, people talk to you like you're an idiot. "nice bet, asshole", etc. So that's probably one reason that people can make money on this strategy. I had multiple people saying "I'm calling the next time you pull that," or, "If I had Q-high I'd call you."

I got bored with the strategy pretty quickly though, but I might go back to it to start clearing this Full Tilt bonus I just started.

P.S. You would not believe how hard it is to fold AKo when everybody has folded before you. Unless you have discipline, you probably will break the rules some. I mean, limping with QQ?

[Talking Poker]

Right.... I don't know that I could do it, but I think it's a very interesting strategy. If you or anyone knows exactly who came up with this, feel free to contact the guy and direct him to this thread. I'd be interested to her it from the horse's mouth, along with what kind of numbers he's achieved playing this way over what I would imagine amounts to tens of thousands of hands...