![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
men is a cheat , and that "guy" that busted him out also has some interesting things to say about it too. Do a google search, he also had a thing in cardplayer.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I too would like to see the RGP post. I just heard the rumours about Chip Reese and Doyle being cheats as well.
__________________
"Know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em" Fill out some surveys and get paid. Made $206 so far! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
essentially russ g cast a very wide net, and in doing so i am sure that he has actually implicated some cheats. i have no idea whatsoever if doyle, chip, men, etc are cheats, but the cynical side of me says that there is a pretty good chance that if you are a professional poker player, then you wouldnt be against gaining small (or enormous) edges wherever you can.
i think that russ g hurts his credibility by implicating every big time pro as a cheater, but i am sure that some of his accusations are right on. if you want to find some interesting old posts on rgp, search for any posts by doyle, who posts as texas dolly. there is some pretty interesting stuff, with significant allegations flying back and forth, and apparently some challenges that were never met. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have read the stuff by DN on Men, very interesting. And he suggested stuff about Doyle without being specific. I havent heard anything on chip. I can take like 10 min. of RGP at a time about once a week thats it. I'll look other places, because this stuff is fascinating to me. that they would have the balls to even try some of the cheating stuff. I am sure back in the day, Doyle gained plenty of edges. If anyone has anything specific, or good links post em.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
grain of salt guys.. grain of salt:
Some guy who claims he's a cheat himself (says he runs a boiler room too) Second part below: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is supposedly written by DN...
Daniel Negreanu wrote: BTW, I found this on another site where they were discussing these RGP posts so hopefully they're accurate. But as I said, take this with a grain of salt. |
![]() |
|
|