![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Daniel is my pick as well. He is younger and has more stamina. Beyond that obvious statement, I think Daniel is better at deriving info from his opponents. Doyle is the man, but I think Daniel is on another level. When he wants to be, that is.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Negreanu, for sure.
BTW, I'm moving this out of "Off Topic" since it's poker related. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
he's also much younger....
remember doyle does this at "older than dirt" age.. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
daniel is good but ill take the guy with 10 bracelets and a whole lot of years of experience
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
how about Phil Ivey or Daniel?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
No disrespect intended to Doyle, but I'm not sure that that he's still playing at the level of Daniel and Ivey on a day to day basis. He's a legend, and proved he is still capable of cleaning house in any given event, but I'm going to go with a younger talent. Meanwhile, Daniel has had an incredible run, but if I could back anyone, I'd put my money behind Phil Ivey.
|
![]() |
|
|