|
|
|
|
#1
05-02-05, 11:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Sadly, I don't see it happening either.
A few months ago (was it even that long?) when you were playing ALOT of poker, I remember a shitload of HHs. It just seems like you're posting them to show us how you played a hand. Instead of posting one of your HHs, which most people overlook anyway, ask a question if you really want to know something. I don't think any of us care that some fish called your pot sized bet w/ a draw, even though you were holding the nuts. Whatever.
__________________
|
|
#3
05-02-05, 12:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's an example. I just read one of your hand histories...
4 players called your UTG PFR of 25c in a 5c/10c game. You're holding A4s. (Not even going to discuss the problem with that...) Anyway, 5 players see the flop, you spike 2 pair, and go all-in, first to act. Idiot calls with JJ, and you win. C'mon man.
__________________
|
|
#5
05-03-05, 01:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have yet to read the latest batch, and I'm not one to discourage poker discussion, but what Aeq is saying is correct. If you have a Hand History you'd like to discuss - especially if you have a SPECIFIC question, by all means post it. But try not to post a bunch of "How did I do?" hands, especially when they are relatively no brainers (ie, slowplaying quads).
Personally, *I* prefer discussing hands that put ME to the test - ie, I'm the one on a draw or I'm the one with a marginal hand and I'm trying to figure out what my opponent has and if I should make that big money call on the river or not... as opposed to hands where I'm WAY ahead and I take all the guy's money. Sure, that's fun and all, but what is there is discuss? |
|
#6
05-03-05, 01:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
P.S. Brian isn't getting his own section.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
