|
|
|
|
#1
09-22-10, 07:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Kurn about the current hand.
With regards to the first hand, if the red card didn't come into play then it's pretty much a non-issue isn't it? The addition of that card (assuming it is a 53rd card) doesn't really alter the odds any as it's not a valid card. Had it come up in play then the had should be declared dead, otherwise it's as if it's not even there. In the interests of customer service, I'd probably throw the guy some comp but that's about it. |
|
#2
09-23-10, 01:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the argument is that there's no way to tell for sure if that card was missing from the 1st hand the dealer dealt... in other words, the first hand may have been played with a 51 card deck.
__________________
GO GREEN!!! GO WHITE!!! |
|
#3
09-23-10, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think Kurn is right on both hands.
You can't possibly know what is wrong with the deck if there is already an improper card with it.
__________________
"And that's how you play aces." Yeah, you make kings run in to them. |
|
#4
09-26-10, 01:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with Kurn on both rulings.
|
|
#5
09-26-10, 08:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
FWIW, this is why good dealers are (should be) trained to count the remaining deck down during lulls in the action during a hand. If this had been done in an earlier hand, maybe the mistake never happens. It's tough multi-tasking, counting *and* paying attention to the table, but it should be part of the job.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind." Old Norse adage |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
