![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I said I was thinking about moving "some of" my play to Stars. Basically, Full Tilt rewards consistency and longevity, where Stars rewards volume. So, if I get my 200 points per day 25 days a month, I'll continue to get Iron Man status (worth 1000 medals per month for me now) and of course my rakeback, but above and beyond that, why not get some play in at Stars too for their VPP/rewards program?
In theory, I should be able to maintain Iron Man at Full Tilt and still get at least Gold and probably Platinum status at Stars pretty easily. Had I been focused on this all year, I think I'd have made Supernova without too much trouble, which certainly has it's benefits. I was actually considering still going for it this year, but with me planning on taking the month of November off from poker, I think it would be too difficult for me. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
stars also has over twice the volume, particularly for non-NLHE 6-max games, of FTP. So with the most limited of table selection that translates to a HUGE reason to play stars.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I don't have a big enough sample size yet, but from what I have seen, there are definitely more limit tables to choose from on Stars and the games are softer. There are plenty of regs, but it seems like there are more fish playing too.
|
![]() |
|
|