|
|
|
|
#1
03-02-05, 05:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Well, even in tight/aggressive games, the pot gets big sometimes and then the concepts work.
You know the old joke about the guy who goes to the doctor and says "Doc, it hurts like hell when I do this" and the doctor says "so stop doing that." That's a long way of saying that with all the games available online, once you see that your table is tight/aggressive, leave. I go by the simple test that if you can't play AJo profitably UTG, or can't limp with small pairs UTG, get out and find another game. Game selection. Game selection. game selection. |
|
#3
03-04-05, 04:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great point, couldnt agree more. If you have all these choices, it makes sense to scope out the best games. How much time does everyone spend scoping out the games first? Do you take 5 or 10 minutes to look around, spy on a table for awhile, or do you just jump right in?
Curious to see what most of you do. |
|
#5
03-04-05, 01:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It differs
For 2/4 Limit bad beats, I tend to jump right it, though I at least wait for the blinds as opposed to posting early. For 25NL, where I’m less experienced, I will scout the tables a bit, looking to avoid sitting in front of a huge stack, and hoping to find a table where at least a couple of the players are at $15 or less.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
