SD or NonSD?

[jhill3535]

In PT3, this graph is available in the graphs tab

Just filter for "won hands"

[Wes]

Honestly I would be pretty shocked if anyone on this forum were winning from non-showdown hands. I certainly don't. Partly has something to do with that I call down lighter than most, but I'm not really aggressive enough on later streets to value bet lightly enough to bluff in some spots.

There was a time where I was trying to improve these silly lines in pokerev, but I just gave up looking at pokerev because it mostly just turned into another excuse for playing badly.

[melioris]

this is where I was hoping this thread would go.

I spent about 4 months at the beginning of the year trying to "develop a more consistent winning style" by not having to depend on the majority of my winnings come from showdown.

But then I realized for me a laggy, very aggressive big pot style in which I was bluffing a lot and value betting thin (increasing winning non SD pots while losing more SD pots) was not a good fit for me personally. I sucked at it and I lost a shitload of money trying to play a style that wasn't fun for more and felt unnatural. So then I went back to my nitty, 'get the money in when I am good' style, and got back to my normal ways. And since I table select pretty well and there are still lots of bad players willing to it in with the worst of it, I could be a winning player. And then I found PLO and fell in love with that game.

I still like pokerev a lot, particularly as most of my profit comes from SD pots I like to follow how hot and cold I am running in SD pots. And it makes pretty graphs for omaha.