|
|
|
|
#1
06-04-07, 05:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting. From what I understand, Party execs pay off the feds not to bust them for activities prior to the UIGEA.
Then they're wasting their money since you can't punish anybody for acts that weren't against the law when they were committed. Section 9 - Limits on Congress The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person. The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind." Old Norse adage |
|
#3
06-04-07, 09:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
But NOBODY has been prosecuted for violations of the UIGEA committed prior to enactment of the UIGEA. The NETeller execs are de facto being prosecuted for violation of the Wire Act, which pertains to sports betting. If Party Gaming has no affiliation with sports books that handle wagers on US sports, they have nothing to fear.
Trust me. ONE major UIGEA prosecution, if the defense handles it properly, will blow out the majority of the enforcement budget.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind." Old Norse adage |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
