|
|
|
|
#1
05-16-07, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
That bugged me when I read it too. It seemed to me that he advocates a REALLY passive style, way more so than the other two. I'm not really sure what the deal is with it.
__________________
anti-sig. |
|
#2
05-16-07, 08:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess that is why he is sarcastically refered to as "Action Dan"
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
|
#3
05-16-07, 08:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hated this book. Really weird since the first two were amazing, especially the red zone chapters of the second book.
__________________
I play a game, it's called insincerity. |
|
#4
05-16-07, 10:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't confuse tight with passive (or loose with aggressive). These are very different things.
|
|
#5
05-16-07, 10:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
too true, too true. The play described after the flop is definitely "passive" as opposed to "tight"
side note: I was happy to see that in the last week, the auto-rate feature on PT gave me a tighter rating. I feel so special when technology praises me.
__________________
poopity, poopity pants. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
