|
|
|
|
#1
03-05-07, 04:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah I'm joking about Full Tilt being rigged (although I would be up a lot this year if I didn't play there). I just think Stars is FAR superior to FT in so many regards (support, software, games, cashing out).
|
|
#2
03-05-07, 09:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
OT, but I prefer Full Tilt - even though I'm willing to concede a few of your points.
The main reasons I prefer FT: 27% rakeback ON TOP OF a good FPP system, loads of promos/bonuses, the ability to datamine and use PT/PAHud to their fullest potential, and even the "Bet Pot" button. I wish their software was better (they continue to improve it, albeit slowly), and no one can match Stars support. I'll definitely give you that. To me though, I'm more than willing to sacrifice the second paragraph for the first. |
|
#3
03-05-07, 10:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since you didn't respond to anything I said...kinda makes me a sad panda...I'm gonna take the this time to respond in general to some things...
I am not "berating" you for your opinion...that's kinda harsh there, Chet. But, still...it is an odd personality trait. I mean, it doesn't affect anything one way or the other. It seems as though you are being results oriented about something that as you have mentioned...doesn't matter in the long run.
__________________
"And that's how you play aces." Yeah, you make kings run in to them. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
