The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-07, 01:08 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default

january 20, 2009 is the first day George W Bush will not be POTUS.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
  #2  
Old 01-22-07, 01:55 PM
melioris melioris is offline
squeezed the charmin
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 3,015
melioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

here is the first draft of my letter

send it


"I am writing concerning the recent activity of the DOJ in relation to online gambling. I am voting member of your constituency, insert other personal info that makes you sound normal here, and as a recreation I play poker online. It is unfathomable to me why the DOJ is pursuing online poker (interestingly, off track betting on horse racing is specifically exempted-thus eliminating any moral rational the DOJ may claim that this is a crusade against gambling) when there are far more significant, and clearly illegal, injustices that are condoned by the DOJ’s lack of attention.

I encourage you to investigate this reckless activity by the DOJ. If you are as rationale as your voting record suggests, I predict with you will agree with my position that the DOJ activity is asinine. Furthermore, I encourage you to support the regulation and taxation of those in the business of providing online poker rooms. It would be a reliable source of funding for the government in these challenging times. Interestingly, to the best of my knowledge, every legitimate online poker room supports the regulation and taxation of their business by the US government.

I am resisting the urge to rattle off why I think the DOJ’s actions in this matter are wrong. Instead I urge you to become informed of this issue and come to your own conclusions. Thank you for your time,"
  #3  
Old 01-22-07, 02:07 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default

note edits.

Rational/rationale were reversed in your letter. Better to call the DOJ misguided than asinine despite what we really think.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
  #4  
Old 01-22-07, 02:08 PM
melioris melioris is offline
squeezed the charmin
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 3,015
melioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Pointsmelioris has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

thanks for the proofread.
  #5  
Old 01-22-07, 02:27 PM
Boobie Lover Boobie Lover is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,795
Boobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep PointsBoobie Lover has between 1000 and 1499 Rep Points
Default

I don't particularly understand what going after the DOJ is going to do since they are just pursuing action on laws that are already in place. Perhaps a couple quibbles about the laws in place would be better.
  #6  
Old 01-22-07, 02:33 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default


The only way to "go after" the DOJ is to get Congress to pass a law that negates the one they're currently trying to enforce.

Besides, if the DOJ is asserting that NETeller, et al is guilty of aiding a "criminal activity" because internet gambling is in violation of the Wire Act, there is case law that refutes that assertion.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
  #7  
Old 01-26-07, 01:57 PM
lightfungus's Avatar
lightfungus lightfungus is offline
Back in business!
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,259
lightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointslightfungus has between 750 and 999 Rep Points
Default

So should we be not cashing out until things blow over (fingers crossed) and should we not be reporting gambling wins/losses come this April?
__________________
I need 'em for my footsies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com