Talking

[omahilo]

I have a question for you... I know you have your top sites you play on, on your site review. I was wondering if you could by any chance make another one but put them in order by how easy it is to clear the bonus. I wouldnt mind bonus whoring your sites but I dont want to be spending 20 yrs to clear a bonus lol. If you can help out with this that would be nice... thanks.

[jillaj]

I would also sign up for many of the sites if you had a section that cleared up all of the bs in some of the offers.

[BlibbityBlabbity]

I would agree it would be nice if there was someplace that had "detailed" and up-to-date explanations of the terms & conditions for these bonus offers/free sign ups, etc.

I think there are some serious issues with providing that info as a third party though. All the sites, I would guess, have the "terms may change with no warning, at our discretion" note, so it would be a huge hassle to keep current with them and keep the info accurate.

I know, when I was researching the way that Pokerchamps does there rakeback, for my affiliate offer there, I had to re-read their "cheat-sheet" 4-5 times to really understand how it worked. Can't imagine doing that for 10-20 sites, on a regular basis.

[Talking Poker]

I can give it a whirl for you, if you like.... but for what it's worth, ease of earning a deposit bonus is a BIG factor in how I make my rankings.

[omahilo]

I would also suggest looking at the type of games (loose, tight, etc) because the Absolute Poker bonus was a bitch to clear... I was playing 1/2 and the game was so tight... you would raise preflop and it would fold around. I thought Absolute was horrible.

[Talking Poker]

Yeah, that site used to have the "absolute" easiest bonus to clear.... 100 raked hands was all it took. But then they changed it, and now it's one of the worst.

I disagree that it was a tight game though. I thought they players there were TERRIBLE!

[omahilo]

I dunno my table was bad... it might of just been that table.