Over stating the obvious (Poker Tracker)

[Penguinfan]

As basically a SNG and MTT player I was never convinced that PokerTracker would do me a lot of good, well I finally got a copy since I am playing more and more NL cash games.

I dumped about 8000 hands into it from the last couple months and was honestly suprised to see how much AA was costing me, I knew I had lost some big pots with them, but really didn't know how bad it was.

AA 34 times LOST $45.40 with it, but what really suprised me is that I actually won with it 28 times, but the times I won I never won a pot bigger than $2.15!

True as they say, either win a small pot or lose a big one.


KK and AK have been slightly profitable, but only becasue I have rarely went to a showdown with them.


12.07BB/100 hands, I have no idea how that ranks out. Good, Bad, average, someone tell me.


Poker Tracker is the shit, and in case you didn't know, grass is green.

[Talking Poker]

Limit/NL, stakes?

[Penguinfan]

Mix of $25 and $50 NL

[Penguinfan]

Even if that is low, keep in mind that it wasn't that long ago I sat down at a cash table and just bled chips left and right so I'm pretty happy to be on any plus side about now.

[Talking Poker]

> 0 = winning = good. Seriously.

I don't know NL BB/100 numbers very well, but I think for those limits, those are solid numbers, expecially when you consider how AA has been treating you.

[eejit101]

4BB/100 is damn solid.

12.x is bloody great. nice going

[melioris]

10-15BB/100hands is sustainable at $25NL. Although the difference is only slight, I haven't been able to crush $50NL for 12-15BB/100 over anything more than 2-4k hands spurts. But 5-10BB/100hands is doable for the $50NL over the long run. Evidently I wear pink panties because I haven't been able to beat 100NL for anything more than 4BB/100hands, making $25 and $50NL more profitable for me, particularly because I can multi-table those levels like a brain dead monkey, whereas at $100NL I have to pay attention.