6 max vs full

[lightfungus]

I have been playing only full tables for the past few months and have just recently switched to 6 max. I have found an increasing number of ijits at these and I double up more often, but I thikn maybe that is just a phase and also has to do with playing party instead of stars. If not, let me know.

The real question is if any of you guys with PT notice a difference in your records between these two. Does it vary between L and NL?

[PShabi]

I started playing 6-max the first of June after reading what TP had to say about it so many times.

1) 6-max = more hands/hour = more rakeback (the pots are still getting raked, they're actually bigger than some full tables)
2) Players are worse (the fish like action, not waiting around, it's where they play) and I earn more money.

So if you make more BB/100 hands and can get in 100 hands much quicker I think it's a no-brainer.

Not to mention, it's a lot more fun. It benefits the more aggressive players, which I am. You see more hands. You have to play more hands. It's all good.

[Talking Poker]

It's no secret that I love 6 max.

And yes, I'm much better at it than I am at full ring games. I'm talking limit here, btw.

I've played about 20 times more 6 max than I have full ring though, so I'm not exactly comparing apples to apples.

[kkirk1329]

6 max is alot better in my opinion, you see more hands, and get to change it up and play some cards that you normally wouldnt at a full table

[Talking Poker]

LOL