The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-06, 02:43 PM
Reel Deal's Avatar
Reel Deal Reel Deal is offline
I'm on a boat
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: NE Fla
Posts: 6,651
Blog Entries: 3
Reel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsReel Deal has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default NFL Helped Get Internet Gambling Bill Passed

Lobbyist Helps NFL Get Internet Gambling Legislation Passed

The NFL used lobbyist Marty Gold, a former counsel to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), to “ram through Internet gambling-curbing legislation in the final minutes of the legislative session,” according to sources cited by Geoff Earle of the N.Y. POST. Opponents of the bill “charge that the NFL broke the rules when it fast-tracked legislation that never even got a vote in the Senate.” The league first tried to “tack the bill onto final defense legislation that couldn’t be amended.” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and former Commissioner Paul Tagliabue wrote Senate Armed Services Committee Chair John Warner (R-VA), saying that the bill “was an ‘achievement’ he could be proud of, but that couldn’t get through the Senate by regular means.” After Warner refused, Frist “hatched a new plan to add it to a bill to secure the nation’s ports.” U.S. House Homeland Security Committee Chair Pete King (R-NY) “allowed it onto his port bill without a vote by negotiators.” King: “I’m not going to stop a bill because of Internet gambling” (N.Y. POST, 10/10).

Thanks a lot NFL, you know you could have had them narrow the bill to only include betting on sports.
__________________
GO GREEN!!! GO WHITE!!!
  #2  
Old 10-10-06, 02:47 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

WTF? Thanks a lot.

I hate everyone.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #3  
Old 10-10-06, 02:56 PM
Tony Cheval's Avatar
Tony Cheval Tony Cheval is offline
Seven Card Stud
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,349
Tony Cheval has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsTony Cheval has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsTony Cheval has between 250 and 499 Rep Points
Default

Boycotting the NFL now. Soccer 4 Life baby!
__________________
Smooth, but not rich.
  #4  
Old 10-10-06, 02:56 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

This is the height of hypocracy, or at least stupididty.

The NFL has been against gambling on it's games weather off-shore or in Vegas for a long time. The NCAA holds a similar position.

ESPN has been noted as siding with this anti-gambling stance.

Do any of the above groups have even the smallest clue how their product IMMEDIATLY becomes less valuable if gambling were to somehow be banned altogether? Honestly, does anyone think people are watch a Monday night game involving Oakland and KC of they don't have money on it?

OK, maybe some people would still watch because it's MNF and they have a fantasy player on the field, but you can't tell me anyone on the country gives a solid shit about Boise ST and Hawaii at midnight on Saturday if they don't have action on the game. There would not be college football 4-5 nights a week if not for gambling on it.

ESPN especially should see this, and I really don't see how the NFL is so blind, honestly. I'm not saying TV money dries up on NFL games if betting is stopped, but it sure goes down a bit, instead of steadily increasing like it has been. As far as the NCAA goes, I honestly thing a bunch of the non-tournament games don't get on TV again if people aren't betting on them.

Think people.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
  #5  
Old 10-10-06, 04:26 PM
Spidey44's Avatar
Spidey44 Spidey44 is offline
Shark
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 936
Spidey44 has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsSpidey44 has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsSpidey44 has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsSpidey44 has between 250 and 499 Rep PointsSpidey44 has between 250 and 499 Rep Points
Default

If you think the NFL is against betting on games you're dreaming. There's a reason that there is a rule in place to have all injuries reported on a weekly basis and it's not to give the opposing teams necessary info.

I'm not sure what their purpose is getting involved with this is though.
  #6  
Old 10-10-06, 04:48 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

Much like the NBA is also not against it? Then tell me why the Maloofs can't have NBA games bet on at their sportsbook?
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
  #7  
Old 10-10-06, 05:40 PM
jillaj's Avatar
jillaj jillaj is offline
grrrrr
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 1,333
jillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Pointsjillaj has between 750 and 999 Rep Points
Default

Conflict of intrest. Company line is against gambling so that the integrity of the game is not questioned. As for the bottom line, gambling helps their business no matter what they publicly say.
__________________
Rompin and Stompin
  #8  
Old 10-10-06, 06:29 PM
Penguinfan's Avatar
Penguinfan Penguinfan is offline
<<<<<
 

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,432
Penguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep PointsPenguinfan has between 500 and 749 Rep Points
Default

Exactly my point, so why did they help push the bill through?
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com