Sharkscope

[Tony Cheval]

Also, it's not so much that I prefer UB, it's just that they had a tasty 100% reload bonus that happens to take forever to earn, so while in Rome..

[eejit101]

These numbers are for STTs and MTTs. If your losing at ring games, and you are $3 a tourney in profit, play these, but my suggestion, find a way to 20 table

[holdemstewart]

I can settle for $3 a tourament, Its still a HELL of a lot better than losing though.

[eejit101]

If it makes you happy man go for it all day every day.

GL

[holdemstewart]

Im not playing for the money as much as I am for the entertainment. So If I can do what I like to do, AND still make a profit (even a small one), I think its a win-win situatoin.

[eejit101]

then play that tourney till you win $3 and quit man.

if you love it then do it.

[Robbie Robb]

Not sure how all y'all are gettin' it to work for you. Neither Nikki or I are able to search. We type in a username, hit search...and....nothing. Thinking it was because the developers suck and somehow broke it in Firefox I tried IE. Nope, nothing there either but IE tells me there's a javascript error.

[BlibbityBlabbity]

same here

[SirFWALGMan]

It says I am a shark.. must be broken.

[SirFWALGMan]

It is CASE SENSITIVE and does not always report when it fails a search. I has issues.

[SirFWALGMan]

Since yall are bragging, 68% ROI is not too Pshabby:

SirFWALGMan 161 $11 $11 68% $1642 - pokerstars x

[Talking Poker]

Actually, it's $383, total (see "Total Profit"). That's the important number, which I believe includes the buy in fees.

[Talking Poker]

I think it's ridiculous that it's case sensitive. Hopefully this is an early version of it and they will improve it over time.

Robbie Robb 96 $0 $5 13% $-52
N1kita 62 $0 $2 87% $-9

And I totally don't get their ROI. How can someone have an 87% ROI with a NEGATIVE total profit? Again, it must be the fees, but to go from 87 to < 0... That's a lot of fees.

[eejit101]

83% ROI baby.

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

[MAYHEM45]

This site is crap. Read the FAQ, sounds like it was written by a SWA, no offense.

[Talking Poker]

I don't really trust their numbers (they seem to be missing a lot of data), but it is definitely better than nothing.

[MAYHEM45]

It says they miss some tourneys during prime time, but whatever, im sure they will get better in the future, although I can see this getting banned if they start charging for it. Its the same thing as poker prophecy was for party poker.

[Talking Poker]

What do you mean banned? Banned by whom, and how so? It's just a database, like thepokerdb - but much more inclusive (with totals, and not just a list of cashes).

[MAYHEM45]

Poker prophecy was the same thing, once money gets involved, party poker doesnt like it. Im sure stars wont mind though, Lee Jones is a pretty lenient guy.