5/10 6-max stats - Page 2

PShabi · #26 12-26-05, 02:18 PM

Alright, I can't let this thread die.

I *think* I found out how to determine stealing winrate in terms of BB/100.

From the general tab in "stats" I go to filter. There's a filter you can check that says "chance to steal blinds." I select "chance to steal & raised" and as I understand it, that changes your stats to situations where you had the chance to steal and actually made a raise to do that.

Then, back on the main page you can see your winrate in those unique situations.

Anyway, my suspicion that blind steal were a big part of my success is true. I'm actuallly winning more in steal situations. Remember, I said I was attempting steals at a rate of 35% and was winning 65% of those hands.

My winrate in terms of bb/100 when making steals is 2.21 / 100 hands. That is just slightly more than my overall winrate.

TP, please use this filter and compare your bb/100 in the blinds to your overall.

Talking Poker · #27 12-26-05, 11:53 PM

For $5/$10 6 max only (apples to apples), using this filter, I'm at .35 BB/HAND (if I'm reading this correctly). Doesn't that mean I'm at 35BB/100?

We're obviously not looking at the same thing here. I'm pretty sure I'm right though. My sample size drops from 24k to 1300 hands, and I made a whopping $4534 on those hands.... yes, $3.50 per hand (playing $5/$10).

Without the filter, I'm at just .03/hand, looking at the same piece of data.

Damn.

I say again: DAMN.

I guess this makes sense though. I mean, most of the money we make should come in late position when everyone has folded in front of us and we raise. If you can't make money in that scenario, when can you???

I suspect the numbers you reported in your previous post are "off." Do you maybe make that many BB per HAND? If so, that's sick.

PShabi · #28 12-27-05, 12:42 PM

Yeah, I was looking at the wrong thing (avg / hand).

My bb/hand is only .22 to your .35.

So, you fucking dominate here too. Fuck, you're good.

Talking Poker · #29 12-27-05, 02:58 PM

LOL... I wouldn't go that far, but I am glad we looked at this with a little more detail. I know on the surface, it seemed like you were really killing in these steal situations, but I think there are other explanations for that - primarily that you SHOULD be killing in those situations. I'm glad you found a way to compare $ to $, as only looking at the stats on the surface can be misleading, as we saw...