#1
|
||||
|
||||
Brag: Stuart Patterson...
In between ridiculous suckouts (KT > KK), a dork hitting 1 outers to CHOP after I got him all in drawing dead, and pretty much every single flush draw getting there when they called all in on the turn.... in between all of that, Stuart Patterson sat down and joined me for a $200+10 HU SNG.
It was a mostly uneventful match, but check out the best hand actually winning! Full Tilt Poker Game #2489657381: $200 + $10 Heads Up Sit & Go (18908026), Table 1 - 10/20 - No Limit Hold'em - 2:21:56 ET - 2007/05/23 Seat 1: Stuart Paterson (1,230) Seat 2: Troll Pie (1,770) Troll Pie posts the small blind of 10 Stuart Paterson posts the big blind of 20 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Troll Pie [Td As] Troll Pie raises to 60 Stuart Paterson raises to 260 Troll Pie calls 200 *** FLOP *** [9s Jc Ad] Stuart Paterson checks Troll Pie bets 360 Stuart Paterson raises to 970, and is all in Troll Pie calls 610 Stuart Paterson shows [Qh 4s] Troll Pie shows [Td As] *** TURN *** [9s Jc Ad] [7d] *** RIVER *** [9s Jc Ad 7d] [9h] Stuart Paterson shows a pair of Nines Troll Pie shows two pair, Aces and Nines Troll Pie wins the pot (2,460) with two pair, Aces and Nines Troll Pie: gg Stuart Paterson is sitting out Stuart Paterson stands up Troll Pie stands up *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 2,460 | Rake 0 Board: [9s Jc Ad 7d 9h] Seat 1: Stuart Paterson (big blind) showed [Qh 4s] and lost with a pair of Nines Seat 2: Troll Pie (small blind) showed [Td As] and won (2,460) with two pair, Aces and Nines |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Preflop play there seems kind of bad. With how shallow you are, I think you have to play push/fold preflop. The only case where I don't see it being bad is if you are going to stack off with ace high a ton because Stu has air too much.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
salazarrr = boobie???
And i may fold that preflop, i know here it worked, but with no reads on him i may fold ATos there |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I can't argue with the preflop comments. I almost pitched it, honestly (I wasn't going to shove with it). Obviously I was willing to go broke on the flop with it if I paired my Ace (and possibly my T, depending on the flop), so for 200 more chips, I took a look.
I know his play looks really goofy once you see his cards, but I actually like it. He just picked a (barely) bad time to do it. If I was any weaker, or if I didn't hit the flop, it would have worked. As for Salazar = Boobie, seems obvious to me too. I haven't banned him yet though, because as of yet, I don't have any IP proof that it is him, and not just someone who thinks/writes/plays exactly like him. Never mind. There it is. Time to ban him... yet again. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Eh I say fuck it and let him stay, it's been long enough. He hasn't been out of line on this account.... While he's "talking poker" let him stay, when/if he's out of line ban him
__________________
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I haven't kept track, but I'll guess that I've banned no less than a dozen accounts of his... maybe 15. You guys probably aren't even aware of 75% of them.
And no, he's going to serve out , which goes until 6/1. I should add days to it every time he comes back and makes a new account, but I get the feeling that if I did that, I'd end up doing it forever, since he obviously can't stay away from this place that gives him nothing as a poker player or as a person. Anyway, after then, if he wants to come back as The Storm, that's fine with me. But he's going to be on pretty much permanent probation. |
|
|