fuel for the fire

[omahilo]

lol Ohio State would of beat Michigan by 2 TDs+ if not for 3 2nd half turnovers, they were already winning by 14 when they had the 1st turnover. This game wouldnt of been even close if not for the turnovers. Also we own Michigan at Michigan or at Ohio State, doesnt matter where we play them.

Also if Boise wants a shot, we will play them after we roll Florida, it doesnt really matter.

[thrash1294]

Yea...

Boise geets no props

[Dodoubled]

Whoa, Tiger. Reread what you wrote. OSU had three second-half turnovers because of bad decisions THEY made.
I hate woulda, shoulda, coulda second-guessing. I mean, if you want to play that game, then I'll say that Penn State would have had a chance against the Buckeyes, too, if Anthony Morelli didn't realize he sucks ass throughout much of the second half of that game.

Now, that sounds pretty stupid. And we all know that's not true. But that's the kind of bullshit second-guessing gets you.

I DO, however, think OSU wins in a rematch. But if the two teams play flawless football, I also think the score is a lot closer than two touchdowns.

[omahilo]

I do agree if there are no turnovers on either side that perhaps the game could be closer but also the buckeyes could of easily rolled that game without those turnovers.

The INT came on a tip pass, that was no fault of Troy Smith. That thing could of hit the ground just as easily. The 2 fumbles came on bad snaps by Doug Datish, which he NEVER does. Those 2 fumbles were something that usually doesnt happen. All Im saying is that those 2 of those 3 turnovers were the buckeyes simply not getting the snap right, which wont happen again in a rematch or the title game.