![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I understand what you're saying, but we're also talking about extremes.  The guy is a maniac after 50, it's pretty clear he'll stay that way.  Dealing with the maniacs or tight-passives is easy. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			For what it's worth, I'm not comfortable with 30 hands on someone, and I'm pretty sure that not many people would be. Then again, I'm not saying I NEED MORE than 1000, I'm saying I don't know. I'm asking what other people are comfortable with. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		 
			 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Gotcha. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		And maybe it's because I ONLY use it to identify the extreme players that I don't care about all the guys in the middle. I simply don't use the software to make decisions for anyone with remotely "normal" looking numbers. I think doing so may be relying on it too much. And really, all those numbers are showing you is how he has played in the past. A guy who is 28/18 is just as likely to have raised you with AA on this hand as he is with 78s. Well, if he's me, anyway. Like I said, I use the numbers to quickly identify the extreme players, and that's it. For everyone else, it's a non factor.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |