![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			lol. Some of these guys are pretty obvious though. This is all for $25NL by the way. If I were playing higher levels, I fully agree with you - 1000 probably isn't even enough. I think that's where the datamining comes in extremely handy - at the higher levels. I think it's fairly pointless to datamine at my level as there are simply FAR too many players. There are some players at $25NL that are hard to get reliable info on without a LOT of hands on them. THOSE are the ones that I pay a ton of attention to and not just rely on the numbers to guide me.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Are you guys insane? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		If a guy's VPIP is 85% at 1000 hands, I promise you he's a maniac. Let him play another 1000 hands and maybe he VPIP will swing all the way to 80% or 90%, but what's the difference? At 100 hands, you knew he was well over 60%, and that's all you needed to know. At 25 hands, I'm certain he wasn't under 30%. It was enough for a read, way back then. Of course the more data you have, the more meaning the numbers have, but don't be afraid to use them much, much sooner - at least as far as identifying extreme players goes.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |