|
|
|
|
#1
07-11-06, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, we got a non-supporter of this bill. He must have some brains.
Oh wait, he just wants more restrictions on gambling. Oops. Somehow he fit pornography into his argument. Nevermind about him having brains. |
|
#2
07-11-06, 01:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
He's just attacking it from a different angle, he wants to legalize and tax on-line gaming, what a thought!
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#3
07-11-06, 01:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Listen to David Scott and tell me what you think he is saying.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
|
#4
07-11-06, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
He's just saying that this bill making internet gambling illegal is ineffective by the means that this bill uses (which is correct). He is still opposed to all forms of gambling, which I disagree with.
|
|
#5
07-11-06, 02:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMO, this is the clear solution to the problem (and yes, of course I am willing to recognize that online gambling CAN lead to problems). The point is, the current bill (you need to go read it all) is ridiculous and needs to be defeated.
|
|
#6
07-11-06, 02:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
MANY things can lead to problems, the Gov't job is not to legislate morality, clearly what they are trying to do here.
__________________
If aces didn't get cracked they would be writing books about me! |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
