Why play for pennies??

[junYUN]

it's really about building a small bankroll. if i have 4.50 in my acct i usually play at the .05/.10 tables to bring me up to 5.50 for an SNG to bring my bankroll back to par.

[drewjax]

I have played a bit at the micro levels, and I think anything is better than play money. People literally cap almost everthing with rags, it is really frustrating. At least at the micro levels, there is some sort of normalcy, although I know not much. Also, when you get a few bucks in a site but didnt deposit (i.e. free $10 bonus, freeroll win etc.), you can slowly build a bankroll, very slowly of course. but its better than nothing. I was able to build up my bonus on prima, as many people did, to be able to play some real poker.

[Gutzz]

When I first started playing cash ring, I'd play at the micro penny NL tables on PS. You see a friend of mine gave me a few bucks and I just thought I'd build from there.

I don't like the idea of spending hundreds and hundreds of my hard earned dollars on poker .

It really didn't take that long to tripple what he gave me, then i tried the higher limit (at the time it was .1/.25... they didn't have .05/.1 NL tables back then), and got CRUSHED. Emotionally I wasn't prepared at all. So I moved back down and rebuilt.

Anyway, penny tables offer good experience on fundamentals, since all you really have to do is play tight aggro and it should be very profitable. Well, maybe not profitable... but you can build up consistently and then move up to the better limits shortly after .

Cheers,

Gutzz

[jillaj]

I will play these levels late at night when i have been drinking and just want to play some poker but not lose that much money. Play money tables is not poker at all.

[Penguinfan]

HHMM, drinking and poker, BAD MIX!!!!

Me after drinking and playing a while and hitting my straight on the river and pushing all in "Damn, didn't see that flush out there"

[PShabi]

But you'd rather spend 4 hours to win $8.75? Okay then.

[Talking Poker]

Why not just reload and be able to play at a level that's worth your time?

[Penguinfan]

We don't all have an unllimited cash supply like you do money bags

[Gutzz]

PShabi, it's better to spend 4 hours to win 8.75 than play 4 hours and lose 100 .

Which is what would've happened had I jumped into the higher stakes. I was terrible

You don't like the idea of gradually building up a br over time without having to inject money from other sources? I think it's a great idea.

Cheers,

Gutzz

[Talking Poker]

Maybe it's time you start playing better

[TajaUk]

I have played micro limit tables and they can be fun. If I wanna try out a new style of play its nice to use these small limit tables. Any stake is better then play money tables.

[Penguinfan]

[Tuff Luck]

I've played at them before. It's definitely better than play money..

[jillaj]

If people could just play better at the snap o fthe fingers it would work. You have to start somewhere so you might as well start low to minimize your losses initially.

[BlibbityBlabbity]

If poker is a hobby for you then you really don't care whether you start with $10 and build it up to $100 playing micro limits or start with $100 and end up with $1000 playing $1/$2 or higher.

If you are just starting out and you know you are not playing correctly, why would you throw $100 on a site and give it away to players you have almost no chance of beating unless the cards hit you over the head all session?

I think that playing microlimits while reading some books and trying out new ideas is a very good place to start. Learning to read the board and other players hands takes time and personally, I would hate to throw a few $100 to that training when it is available for $10 or so.

Learning and moving up through the levels as soon as you are ready is the only way poker stays interesting/challenging, though. If you were to stay at the micros for more than a few months I think you could start to see boredom setting in and causing you to play more hands, play hands farther than you should, etc.

One Key note is that IMO microlimits CAN ONLY be useful if you forget that the big bet is ONLY 2 CENTS. If you treat a BB as a BB then you can use them as a tool.

Microlimits are also great for developing a tollerance for taking the bad beats, while avoiding tilt. This can help when you move up and people actually start respecting a raise instead of assuming you MUST be bluffing, because who would raise with a good hand? (The mantra of the microlimit maniac )

I will say, however, that it takes a concious effort to adjust to higher limit games after playing at the micros. Where you usually have odds to draw to open-enders and flushes at micros, when you move up and are 2-3 handed after most flops you will lose those drawing odds.

Just my thoughts. I have on a few occasions taken a free $5/$10 or some freeroll winnings on a site that I can't withdraw from and used it as a side project to see how much I could build it up to, or try to build it up to the level required for getting it off the site.

OK , that is enough about that...