|
|
|
|
#1
02-06-06, 03:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Absolutely not. Not even close.
 Well, not everyone. Scroll up a bit. Actually, tis wasn't the first time I've lost to perfect perfect... And I'm sure it won't be the last. |
|
#4
02-06-06, 09:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
One of the worst?
I should hope so, considering it's not mathematically not possible to be farther ahead than this and all. I supose it would have been more dramatic if this was NL and all the money went in on the flop, but looking at it purely based on the cards, you can't be farther behind than needing 2 consecutive perfect cards in order to win a hand. |
|
#5
02-07-06, 01:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
With the amount of hands you play, it had to happen sometime! If it was me, it wouldn't have happened though...
__________________
I need 'em for my footsies. |
|
#6
02-07-06, 01:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I bet I play about 10% as many hands as you think I do.
I feel like I hardly play at all these days... The whole reason for that 6 max challenge was to make me try to find more time for poker. |
|
#7
02-07-06, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol i typed that fast and didnt read it over
i say ONE of the wost because, this one was very very bad also.... you tell me mathematically which one is worse i'm not so sure yours or... KK vs. AK flop 2K2 turn 2 river 2 KK flops kings full and AK two pairs top kicker... the river makes it quad 2's with a king kicker ( the board ) or quad 2's with an ace kicker. regardless yours is hands down an absolute horrible bad beat |
|
#8
02-07-06, 03:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
He would have won with AA also, so it's only half as bad.
|
|
#9
02-07-06, 03:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
well yes he would have won with AA also, but he didnt have AA, he had AK. Its not only that, its the fact that the flop came 2k2.
regardless, that beat of yours was absolutely horrible... bad beats such as that only come once every ten thousand hands or so... just be glad it came in a cash game, and not the final table of the 2006 WSOP Main Event..
|
|
#10
02-07-06, 04:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No.
If the turn and river came A and A, he would have won. That's what I was saying. Aces full beats Kings full. |
|
#11
02-08-06, 09:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where is your sense of drama? Starting hands should be KK vs A3.
Maybe this is wrong, but the only thing worst would be KK vs AA, flop coming KK2 and then turn and river of AA, and then it would be a tie with TP's sob story. The point is can a person be farther behind on the flop to come back to win? Pretty much any situation in which you are chasing a two outer on the flop and then a one outer on the turn. |
|
#12
02-08-06, 09:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right.... you can't be farther behind that needing two exact cards to come in order to win the hand.
|
|
#14
02-08-06, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a pretty bad O8 beat..
I had the NUT flush draw, NUT low draw, and NUT straight with 1 card left to go. I pushed my entire stack in, all $100+ at a .50/1 PLO8 table. So basically any low card and I win half. Any flush card (except one I will get to that) and I win with the Nut flush, or if things stay the same I win. EXCCCCCCCEPT: A 9 of spades came making no low, and the nut-hi for the idiot who called me with a sf! lol. I have no idea what the odds of that is.
__________________
I hate Poker.. and Poker hates me too |
|
#15
02-08-06, 08:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, even if that was the ONLY card in the entire deck that would save him, with 4 cards on the board and 4 in each of your hands, that leave 40 unknown cards. 1 that helps him and 39 that don't.
So, 39:1. That's about 2.5%. Or, expressed a different way, 25 TIMES more than that chances of the hand I posted. You guys are really missing the point here. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
