![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
25+2 turbo SNG's on Stars. Closest thing to printing your own money.
I also mix in MTTs alot, mainly playing the 180's on stars. As of late I've all but given up cash games, But I used to play anywhere up to 400PLO8, 5/10 O8, and 5/10 LHE. I think I will have to learn shorthanded, perhaps getting someone here to coach me, because I find cash games boooooring. There is nothing fun about folding for half an hour and having your first playable hand cracked by 92o. Either that, or watching people drag 15BB pots around EVERY hand, then watching your raise with aces take down the blinds. I think I've proven myself to be a better tournament player anyways, and part of me just likes that there is an ultimate goal in tournaments. I guess for me, poker needs a purpose.
__________________
I play a game, it's called insincerity. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Mayhem, why don't you try playing a LAG style a few times in cash games? Maybe drop down a level if you are unconfortable, and give it a shot. Running over a table is fun, and sometimes you just catch on fire. I find it helps your game anyway, so you can change gears more effectively.
As for the original question, I seriously think there are more fish at .50/1 and 1/2 then there are at the lower limits. I would play there if I had the roll for it, but really I am only rolled for .25/50 and below. I checked my PT stats a minute ago and I see I am actually a losing player at .05/.10 lol I don't know I managed that. I have found .10/.25 easier then .25/.50, but I just may have been running bad in .25/.50 because the players don't seem that good. To me, it seems like the higher the level, the worse the players (up until a certain point obviously), but my sample size may not be good enough. That is over 15,000 hands spread across those levels. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|