|
|
|
|
#1
07-29-05, 11:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I feel like I'm constantly disagreeing...
...I've said it before and I'll say it again, Norman Chad shouldn't be listened to for in depth analysis. He's colorful. It's entertaining.
If ESPN isn't going to have someone to dissect the play as we watch it (ie: Harrington or Furgeson analyzing the play) then I prefer someone like N. Chad. Besides ... I'm in a committed relationship, and his marital humor cracks me up.
__________________
|
|
#2
07-30-05, 02:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
N. Chad is funny and I do find humor in some of the things he saids but your not going to listen to him when it comes to poker advice, etc.
Chad also is just going to call GambleAB a 'regular internet' player because he doesnt know any better, its not like he plays online himself and knows how good he really is. |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
