WANTED: Moderator

[Jackass_man]

I think whatever you do don't let either aquitass or Charles frank moderate. A moderator should have unbiased views and be able to look at things subjectively and not let there own personal squabbles affect their own judgement. Can you honestly say either one of them would do this?

[Tuff Luck]

I am interested in the job, and I have moderated at numerous other boards. I only fear that the poll will turn into a popularity contest, and those most known (i.e. most posts) will get the modship yet just because they know poker, they might not be right for the job. But, hey, I'll get a chance too so I guess I shouldn't complain.

Edit: And while I am not going to point any fingers, jackass has a point in that perhaps those biased shouldn't be eligible, but unless there is some way to accurately judge how biased/opinionate one is, the vote is probably the best way to go.

[Aequitas58]

What does most posts have to do with winning a popularity contest? I have more haters JUST becaust I have one of the top post counts ... and it's pathetic.

Just a word to the wise: when you're trying to "win" something, or come out favorably in a survey or poll or something, don't agree with someone named jackass, who makes a stupid comment to begin with.

[Aequitas58]

Here we go again. Just started reading this thread, and it so happens that my name is mentioned. Ever think that you don't want me to be a moderator because all you do is start shit with me? Constantly? You're obsessed or something, dude - it's weird. (And it's not just you.)

Seriously.

I didn't even "apply" yet, and I don't know if I will. Damn.