The TalkingPoker.com Forum  

Go Back   The TalkingPoker.com Forum > All Things Poker > General Poker Discussion
Register Blogs Arcade HH Converter Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-07, 04:53 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default Yawn

Every time I read something like this I think of how all the big profile drug busts have crippled the drug cartels. Oh, wait. They haven't, have they?

Here's 2 things that will happen if the US government legalizes and regulates internet gambling.

1) The IRS will know EXEACTLY how much you make gambling online, and if you think that's not a bad thing, google "Alternative Minimum Tax."

2) I'll wager right now that one condition of legalization will be that the sites will be required to block datamining software. Buh-bye PAHUD.

Just my periodic "be careful what you wish for" post.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
  #2  
Old 05-15-07, 05:27 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

1. Many (ok, a few) of us report what we actually earn anyway.
2. You really think politicians are going to be smart enough to address this? No way.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker
  #3  
Old 05-15-07, 07:39 PM
Kurn's Avatar
Kurn Kurn is offline
cha'DIch of the Poker Gods
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 3,584
Kurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep PointsKurn User has between 2000 and 2499 Rep Points
Default


Then poker players are more compliant than waiters and bartenders.

I have never in my life met a waiter or Bartender that reports $0.01 more than the 8% of sales his/her employer reports to the IRS as tip income.

As for #2, they won't know about it unless someone clues them in. If clued in, its a virtual lock they'll do it. Remember, they want to "protect" us.

On the other hand, as long as sports betting is involved in legalization, Frank's bill doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing, so the discussion is purely academic.

To my mind, the UIGEA vs Frank's bill is a Hobson's choice. I've come around to the PPA stance of a carve-out for poker because it maintains the status quo of offshore online poker.

Now I admit to a couple personal reasons for feeling this way.

1) I live (and now work) a comfortable distance from a B&M poker room (2 next spring when Mohegan reintroduces poker).

2) The tax laws regarding gambling income are flat out punitive, especially when you factor in the specter of the AMT. And a change to a Democratic administration in '08, while it may help water down the UIGEA, will absolutely not mitigate the tax implications. We may well win the UIGEA battle but ultimately lose the war.

This issue brings me perilously close to breaking my vow not to discuss politics on this forum, but my libertarian voice requires I remind all involved that this country originally arose from a tax revolt, and in that respect (as well as during football season ) I am a true patriot.
__________________
"Animals die, friends die, and I shall die. But the one thing that will never die is the reputation I leave behind."

Old Norse adage
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com