critique these numbers....

[melioris]

Ok, so I recently started playing again after a two-month break. Before the break I was a winning player (limit and NL) at a rate and level I was happy with. After the break this has continued, although this time around I dropped to $25NL and $11 SNGs-didn’t provide myself with a large bankroll and I don’t have enough time to give to the 6-max limit grind (this is my favorite game, but for me it requires lots of time to grind it and built a large enough sample to smooth out some of the variance).

Here are the stats for 6-max $25NL day 1 (approx 1200 hands small sample, I know)
W$SF is 39.4%
W$SD is 46.9%
SD is 9.4%
VP$IP is 28.6%
PFR is 14.2%,
AF is 2.17.

VP$IP is a little high for me. It could be due to small sample or I might be a little loose, I will look into that. Usually I run around 22-25% for NL 6-max. AF is a little low for me, usually I run around 2.8-3.1.

What concerns me is the W$SD. That seems way too low for me and could be a real leak. It tells me is that I am not giving enough credit when players stick around. Solution 1 would be to crank up the aggression a little and then release if anyone sticks, or solution 2 would be to continue as I am but to keep in mind this potential leak.

Any other comments? And I know that this is a small sample size, but these numbers are trending pretty close to normal except where noted.

edit-to correct the grammer mistakes I noticed, can you find more?

[eejit101]

is AF aggression factor?

[melioris]

yeah

[eejit101]

nothing to do with this post, but i just played 200 hands of 2/4 after it some guy told my me AF was 18.4 . thats a big high. I was $220 up though. So....who knows!

Those numbers look ok to me, but im not an expert

[hiimbob12]

200 is a pretty small sample size right?

[eejit101]

very. Just laughed at the number. Its pretty high for any amount of hands