|
|
|
|
#1
05-06-06, 03:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
World Cup
Why the hell was the other thread closed?
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. |
|
#2
05-06-06, 03:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anyway, I agree NOW that we're (USA) in big trouble, if our offensive players weren't as cold as ice at the moment I'd at least give us a fighting chance at swiping the 2nd spot in the group, but you can't win without scoring.
 I do feel we're still on course for a big stepup in 2010 though, not winning per se but we certainly should have a more solid and deeper core to choose from.
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. |
|
#4
05-10-06, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I suspect we are going to run a 4-5-1 (I know that I preached this for England too, but I think it is best for both teams). I think our most effective team would run a 5 man midfield behind McBride up front. The 5 in the mid- Beasly, Donovan, and Dempsey, supported by Reyna and Mastroeni. Based on the forwards Arena chose, I can’t see it happening another way. We are in serious trouble if Wolff or Ching ever see the field. And EJ is more of supersub than a starter, with his bad foot and all.
I was going to Germany this year, but I knocked my wife up at the wrong time and now instead of going to the WC I got a new baby son. Poor kid, I got to get over this resentment. Tony- do you post at Bigsoccer? |
|
#5
06-07-06, 11:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Occasionally yes, I mostly read, but I occasionally pop up with something (more often a silly retort to some nut).
__________________
Smooth, but not rich. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
