|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Best Thing EVER (Edit: durrr challenges the world HU)
First read the thread, then listen to this...
This is Tom Dwan, better know as "Durrr" online... “I’m making this heads-up challenge to the world. Anyone can accept. Four tables, minimum of $200/$400, and I’ll put up $1.5 million to their $500,000. We play 50,000 hands minimum and if they end up a dollar after rake they keep the side money or whatever. So basically, if you and I played and you won a dollar, you would get my $1.5 million and if I won a dollar I would win your $500,000. “So I’m giving a million dollars free if anyone thinks they can do it.” [ ] giving away a million dollars [x] laying 3-1 odds What durrr said later in this thread Quote: Originally Posted by durrrr ya i mean this wasnt supposed to be posted yet but w/e. Anyway... there are obv a few conditions, im out of it- but off the top of my head: 1) 200-400min (nl/plo obv) 2) can change tables anytime eff stacks are >250bb 3) have to reload when stacks are <75bb 4) $$ won in the challenge is kept obv (if i win 750k in poker, i get that PLUS your 500k- if i lose 750k in poker you get 2.25m total). 5) same stakes the whole time 6) not open to phil galfond The actual thread...
__________________
"Suffer the pain of discipline or suffer the pain of regret" "Rome wasn't built in a day" Last edited by JDMcNugent7; 01-06-09 at 09:25 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Durrbrains
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'd actually buy 1% of sjay if he wanted to go for this. Maybe JD too.
Edit: Just noticed the 4 table thing.... that changes it a bit, I guess. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe I am just nitty, but I can't see doing this w/o 4 million behind (and 100 buyins for the minimum game to 4-table HU doesn't seem nitty).
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Fine. .1%.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
lol, I think the only reason I quoted your post in my about bankroll was because your post was what got me thinking about what kind of bankroll one would need to consider accepting this challenge. Someone more experience give a thought as to the bankroll needed, considering the players all probably don't have a huge edge over each other and most of the action will be coming from the 3:1 of the bet.
Ivey made me chuckle as he got to have it both ways, somewhat agreeing with the interviewer (Greenstein?) that the whole thing is a little childish considering "everyone knows I (Ivey) will play anyone at any game" but at the same time complementing Durrr as one of the few that will take anyone on at HU-NLHE. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I completely missed that PLO was an option. I retract my statement about David B.
This could be the end of durrrr the baller as the world knows him. DB, Ivey, and Antonius have all accepted. I'm pretty sure Dwan is going to get cleaned out. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I predict durrr is in trouble here. Will be fun to follow though!
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I hear ya there!
|
|
|