|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Numbers..
In the last post about "rip my numbers apart", Psabi presented a great 10-side limit breakdown of the important numbers. There is also a nice thread going on about 6-max stats. How about NL? How do you think the stats change? Is it better to be a little less aggressive? More aggressive? What stats should be different?
__________________
I hate Poker.. and Poker hates me too |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In LLNL cash games I prefer to take a "longball"(see HOH) approach, which essentially means that I try to stack my oppenents instead of playing small pots with them. As for stats, here are mine for my main NL game:
NL $25 # of hands:25,110 VP$IP:15.97 VP$IPFSB: 39.6% FSBTS:85% FBBTS:83.75% ATSB: 12.9% W$WSF:28.09% BB/100:12.01 (the drop from 14 occured when I used the system outlined here for the last 3K hands) WTSD:19.19% W$ASD:51.98% PFR:3.91% I think that what these stats show is that a winning player at LLNL full games should be tight, and far more passive than at LLHE. This is however based on my experiences at the game and at the lowest possible limits with very few reads (since I 4-table). Any advice on improving these stats would also be appreciated btw. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I agree..
I think I agree with you. Passive but not dead. I always bet my strong hands hard on the flop. If someone pushes, or cold calls then you need to revise your thinking based on the relative strength of your hand, and the opponent.
__________________
I hate Poker.. and Poker hates me too |
|
|