Good stats for a session in 1$/2$ LIMIT

[kkirk1329]

During current Hold'em session you were dealt 182 hands and saw flop:
- 26 out of 36 times while in big blind (72%)
- 20 out of 35 times while in small blind (57%)
- 37 out of 111 times in other positions (33%)
- a total of 83 out of 182 (45%)
Pots won at showdown - 17 of 27 (62%)
Pots won without showdown - 25

I was just looking at these and wondering if i could get any imput on if these stats are good or bad, or would you all say its just a matter of how certain people play and stats arent that important?

[nflchad]

Stat's are important, but they don't really mean anything unless you have several thousand hands.

[Talking Poker]

This may be true, but even with a sample size this small, these numbers are way, way, way too loose.

These are too loose for 6 max, but if this was a full ring game, they are WAY too loose.

[Robbr25]

I agree with TP 45% is way too loose for a full table.
I usually aim for 22-28%, may be a bit tight, but when
I am that disciplined, I seem to win more money.

[Windbreaker]

Without looking at the numbers at all, the numbers for a particular session don't necessary indicate how well/poorly you played.

You can have the most awful numbers out there....but if you made the right decision, you still play well.

I usually disregard the numbers and worry about the play. If I make a poor decision, then I think I play poorly...regardless if I won a huge pot as a result. Numbers will change as with the table, opponents, and situations that are faced....don't worry about them as much as the decision you make.

[Talking Poker]

Seeing nearly half the flops after 182 limit hands is too loose. I don't care how great a run of cards you had, that's too loose, which is the same as making "poor decisions" in my book.

His showdowns won number (THAT is a result) is meaningless, of course, but you can still tell that he's seeing way too many flops.