Donkeytest

[MAYHEM45]

This was on the frontpage of cardrunners this morning, take the test then post your score here.

I got a 112 while talking on the phone and MSN at the same time, pretty dumb of me, but i got called right after I clicked start on the timed test. That probably affected my score a bit. I'm interested to see what some others here get on it.

[Zybomb]

Your PokerIQ is: 116

Your Complete Poker Intelligence Profile has been generated and can be accessed immediately for only $9.95.

Wonder if that complete anaylsis thing would be cool? I kinda rushed this considering I have to leave for work now... but I dont think it changed much

[Gordogg]

Your PokerIQ is: 110

Cool test.

[Talking Poker]

We should place bets on what JD will score.

I hope all the regulars here take this... will be very interested to see if anyone scores REALLY high - or if anyone will admit to scoring less than 100, even though that's to be expected for a lot of the less experienced players here.

[eejit101]

Your PokerIQ is: 107.

As its mainly a cash game question i expected that.

And ill admit i had NO CLUE as to "the reverse implied odds" question.

[kkirk1329]

Your PokerIQ is: 110

[Talking Poker]

I also had a 116. I was hoping to be in the low to mid 120s range, to be honest.

The test took me longer than I expected - about 40 minutes to complete - not sure if that affects my score or not. I had a couple of distractions early on, and then admittedly took forever (3-4 minutes) on one question towards the end. The one where you need to figure out what all three players had.

I felt like I knew the answers to many of the questions, but I will gladly admit that some of them were VERY tough situations where I just wasn't sure which answer was better.

I'll pay for my profile and tell you guys if it's worth it.

[Talking Poker]

I think this test may be pretty decent - So far, the scores posted in this thread don't surprise me... and please don't anyone take offence to that... Remember, 100 is average.

Also, I just noticed this LOL-testamonament on their site:

[Talking Poker]

OK, here is what the paid results look like. I'm not exactly sure what the numbers in the graph represent.. I think the "This score is better than xx.xx% of all persons taking this test" ones are much more important.

BTW - as you can see in the graph, I got penalized for my (lack of) speed. Even without distractions, I doubt I would have been above 50% of the other test takers though... For some reason, it's way easier for me to "see" poker than it is for me to "read" poker. I found myself having to reread quite a bit as I was going through the test.

The only that that really surprises me in my results is my terrible Tournament score. I don't think there were enough tournament questions, to be honest, and I'm very surprised that I finished that poorly in that category. Meh.

I can't say my suckiness with big pairs (better than exactly 50% of the other test takers) surprises me, honestly. Conversly, check this out:
Anyway, here is the full text of my report, in case anyone else is considering purchasing theirs:

[Talking Poker]

Now that I have seen , I definitely would have liked to score in the 120s (and maybe I would have, if not for the distractions/interruptions that killed my time). I still think this test is pretty accurate though.

They have had 43,546 people (and counting) take the test so far, so the 100 mean score thing should most definitely be accurate.

[GTDawg]

112

I think I push all-in too much.

[melioris]

I'll burst the bubble. score of 95.

Took me just about an hour as soon as I started I had to get my ass kicked at Candyland (I even cheated and my 3.5 year old still won) and feed my 1.5 year old. For pride sake I would like to take it again, but I guess that score would be biased so I will have to live with my low score.

Alas, I suck.