View Single Post
  #6  
Old 11-15-06, 04:07 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Looking these numbers over and comparing them to my own is very interesting. I think more than anything, the small sample sizes are the problems here (variance is a bitch)... but I also think that is is possible to be a big winner with fairly different numbers than another big winner may have. I don't think there is a right or wrong VPIP, for example. What matters is the combination of all of your numbers and how that style works for you. PT can't show how good you are at changing gears to take advantage of your image and so on and so forth. PT can't show how easily you tilt or if you are able to keep control of your emotions.

In other words, I think doing stuff like this is a good exercise and definitely hgas value if any of your numbers are WAY different than the winners, but I don't think you have to try to shoot for these exact same figures. This is just a starting point...
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker