View Single Post
  #6  
Old 11-10-06, 01:13 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

This is very interesting. I was shocked reading your first paragraph until I remembered that you were talking about full ring. I'm wondering how your strategy would work at higher levels. Maybe you should find out for us someday (hint hint).

Regarding your 6 max play, your PT numbers look very reasonable to me. You play a bit tighter than I do, but I think that is not only fine, but probably preferable at the levels you are playing. How does your play compare to what I've shown in my videos so far? The reason I am asking is because I intend to make some lower limit videos at some point. I assume my style will still produce winning results, but I think it may need to be tweaked a bit for optimal results. What I suspect is that things like firing that big bluff on the turn will become less profitable (I won't be able to get my opponents to fold as easily), and "fancy" plays (squeeze plays, for example) won't be as effective. So to adjust fot that, I think I'd need to tone down the aggression a bit and play just a little bit tighter... and doing that, I'd expect my PT numbers to look pretty similar to yours.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker